China Earthquake
12 May 2008

Roger Musson from the British Geological Survey

At 06h 28m GMT today, the rocks either side of a major fault in south-west China suddenly and violently broke apart.

The shock waves spread out in all directions, like waves in a pond. In a mere seven minutes, the fastest waves reached the UK, where they were recorded on monitoring equipment up and down the country, operated by the British Geological Survey.

BGS, a component of the Natural Environment Research Council, is the UK’s national institute for all aspects of earth sciences.

While the seismic network is primarily directed to recording British earthquakes, the larger earthquakes from all over the world are also picked up.

Quickly alerted, BGS seismologists analysed the data and prepared an alert to inform government and relief organisations.

In the long term, data gathered about earthquakes such as this one can be used to build up a picture of the rate and severity of earthquakes in different parts of the world, used to assist engineers in designing safer buildings.

Ultimately, most earthquake deaths are caused by collapsing buildings. A safer urban environment is the key to reducing death tolls in the future.

340quakeblogpic


'Freedom is so close I can almost taste it'
04 April 2008

'Hope' is a blogger in Zimbabwe, who is writing for Sky News as President Robert Mugabe clings to power.

350zimbabweharareeyewit

I’ve been mulling over Mugabe’s options with regards a looming ‘run-off’ election. I’d be interested to know what other people think.

What are Mugabe’s options realistically?

1. Go through the run-off against Tsvangirai and unleash violence on the people and rig the result to the last paper in the box.

I am hoping he is too arrogant to do this (as my UK friend seems convinced of now), but what if he does do this? We just need to prepare and stay calm and keep our eye on the ball. What’s different now is he has to go through a run-off in the face of a nation that already knows he is a loser and in a weak position. He also has to do it with the world staring at him like he’s an insect under a microscope.

2. Avoid the run-off and retire. I hope so, but this will involve losing face so it’s a hard one for me to imagine him doing as much as I would like too.

3. Try to bluff it out and declare himself the outright winner and refuse a run-off. This is very Mugabe-esque to me, but he has to deal with the uncertainty of how the world and the people will react. It isn’t that I think he cares about what anyone thinks - he doesn’t - its more that I’m not sure how he can ever begin to hope to solve the crisis facing him with hyper-inflation etc, if the world thinks he has stolen the election.

He needs legitimacy to get the help and investment he needs. At the end of the day, its the economy that’s his biggest enemy, not the opposition.

4. The final option is the talk, the fear that everyone has been expressing tonight with the latest news - of him avoiding a run-off by imposing military rule. Maybe, but this must be kept in perspective.

At this precise moment in time Zimbabwe is incredibly calm. The air is thick with expectation, but the people are quietly, peacefully, patiently waiting. The one thing Mugabe’s government has taught us how to do very well is ‘wait’. We queue for everything. So we can wait.

To me, to suddenly declare a military takeover in this climate of calmness would be impossible for him to justify to the region or to the world, or even to the Zimbabwean people. There is no instability. We are not trashing shops, looting property, or hurling stones at the police. We had elections and he lost; its called democracy (although our version is a bastardised version of democracy) and it happens in lots of countries around the world. It isn’t an argument for military control.

So maybe he needs to poke us a bit and make us frightened and force a reaction to create the necessary conditions. Maybe that’s what the raids on a hotel are about? Especially a hotel where journalists were staying? And why not arrest a couple of journalists too to make damn sure the media don’t miss the actions. He can certainly rely on them to ramp up the drama and drum home the fear.

I am determined to not let Mugabe scare me. I plan to try to consciously hold my nerve in the face of his horrible bullying of our nation - and God knows it probably will be a rough ride and cruel. (What do we expect? This is Mugabe we’re talking about!)

But we all have important work to do and we can’t afford the distractions that fear brings to the table.

Freedom is so close I can almost taste it.

:: Find out more about Sokwanele, the Zimbabwe Civic Action Support Group, by clicking here


My thoughts are about Mugabe
02 April 2008

'Hope', a Zimbabwean blogger who has written for the Sky News Eyewitness blog in the past, has a new message for Robert Mugabe:

Zimbabwe

He has been unwelcome for so many years now, and he has always known that he has lost previous elections. This time it is different.

He can’t stand in front of us and tell us how popular and wanted he is, daring us to say different, with us silenced and only knowing by the proof that is in ours hearts and bodies that he is a liar.

This time, as one newspaper report put it, ‘the writing is on the wall’: in every little nook and cranny of our lovely country, ordinary people, rich and poor, saw with their own eyes that Mugabe and his band of thugs was finished.

Try to stand before me now, Mr Mugabe, and tell me how much the nation wants you!

Now I can smile to your face and tell you that you are deluded, a liar and the worst kind of thief. A man who through selfishness and complete arrogance will hang on to a figment of his own imagination that he is respected and wanted and admired, and in so doing impose the worse kind of suffering on an entire nation of people.

We could have said all this to Mugabe before, but he would have looked at us in that smug, self-centered, challenging manner he has, with a smirk that says ‘prove it’!

Well, now we can. You are not popular, Mr Mugabe. You haven’t been for a very long time.

Being able to prove it, however, doesn’t make it true at last; it merely confirms what we all have known - you included - for years and years and years. What it means is that you have to find a way to accommodate within yourself the enormity of the realisation that we, as a nation, have been filled with disgust and despair at you for years.

You are not adored. Mr Mugabe. Move on and allow us to breathe again. Your presence in power suffocates our future and ruins our lives.

It may surprise people to know that a person like me, who has worked against this man for so many years, actually spends very little time thinking about the man that Mugabe is.

My thoughts, and I know the thoughts of my colleagues, have always been leaden with the weight of the knowledge of how much the people in Zimbabwe are suffering. How deep their pain is; how ingenious and incredible they are in their ability to keep surviving despite the odds against them; and how tragically and bitterly isolated they have been for so many years in their grief and hardship, shut off from the world and seeingly abandoned to a fearful future. Forgotten.

I have not been motivated by hate for Robert Mugabe; I have been motivated by the deepest compassion for my fellow human beings.

I am endlessly overwhelmed by Zimbabwean people, and my bond has grown immeasurably through the last few years. How can I do anything except admire the fortitude of human beings who can always find a bit of dry humour in a crisis, who toil in loneliness in foreign countries simply so they can send home money for elderly relatives and young siblings; who manage to stand apart from violence no matter how deep the provocation has been?

If I could be half as courageous or half as strong as the Zimbabwean people I encounter I would be such a rich person. Zimbabweans are amazing; and their quiet strength and dignity only makes Mugabe seem so much more abusive and cruel.

So I don’t usually think about Mugabe on a personal level at all: but today I have.

Find out more about Sokwanele, the Zimbabwe Civic Action Support Group, by clicking here


Why McCain Has Already Won the US Election
08 March 2008

By Mel Graykin, New Hampshire Voter, Writer And Blogger

I observe with amusement that your man in Washington, Jon-Christopher Bua, is still treating this as if it were really an election, as if there were really some doubts as to the results.  Heck, doesn't he know that it was decided already long ago?  This is just a block-buster entertainment spectacle, the kind Americans are known for.  McCain will be the next president of the United States.  It was rather predictable, given the field of candidates.  For all the talk of Change, pick the one least likely to upset the status quo and put your money on him.

The Democratic strategy has been pretty clear; they've narrowed it down to two candidates who are unelectable.  Makes it fun for the Progressives (and scares the pants off Conservatives) to think that we might actually elect a black man or a woman (or both, if you heed the rumor that one might choose the other for a running mate). 

But of course it won't happen.  When push comes to shoveling mud, the opposition will play on the basic dark fears of the American People "You don't really think a woman could be trusted with the most powerful office in the land?" and "Should the United States be represented by someone of Black Moslem heritage?") and of course, prejudice will prevail.  The way it's looking now, Obama is likely to be the anointed one for the Democrats.  An easy defeat; can you conceive of a US president without a thoroughly Anglo name?

There's big money in War, and the folks who backed Bush are turning a tidy profit in Iraq.  They aren't anxious for us to get out, and McCain has already said he'll keep us there 'til Doomsday if necessary.  That won him the election right there.  Never mind that the vast majority of Americans want out.  They'll vote as they are told, and if they don't, Diebold will just fiddle with the numbers until the totals come out right.  Corporate Republicans will keep control of the White House, and the gravy train will just keep on rolling.

Any chance the United Nations could intervene one of these days and oversee American elections?  It would be nice to actually get back to free and fair, like they have in other countries. 

By the way, one of my favorite news sources, The Onion, ran an absolutely marvelous piece on Diebold (you know, the electronic voting machine people) accidentally releasing the results of the 2008 election prematurely.  In the best spirit of black humor, it is horribly funny because of its grim proximity to truth.


Diebold Accidentally Leaks Results Of 2008 Election Early

 

Find our more about Mel Graykin here.


Hillary Is Too Strong In Ohio
04 March 2008

Senatorhillaryclinton By Dave, Republican blogger from Ohio

Last-minute reshuffling makes it appear that Hillary might just tough out this election in Ohio, in fact it feels like New Hampshire all over again, when all the hype was focused on Obama, and by the early evening it was clear that Hillary was going to win the day.

The same dynamic is going to happen tonight. According to Quinnipiac and the local Ohio Poll, Hillary remains in the lead by a 5 to 9-point margin. She is just too strong in Northeast Ohio (Cleveland) and Southeast Ohio which is largely rural and Appalachian. Think coal miners of West Virginia and you’ll have a good picture.

Obama remains strong in Southwest Ohio, which is the most Republican area of the state, so unfortunately for him, there won’t be as many voters to counteract Hillary’s strength in Ohio.

I’ve got a report in from Hamilton County from a longtime Republican who thought about it, but couldn’t quite go over to help Hillary out.

There’s been some talk about Republicans voting Democratic in order to run against Hillary as they see her as the weaker candidate in November.

In the end though, most Republican voters will vote on the Republican ticket. My friend ended up voting for Fred Thompson as a protest vote, and I may end up doing the same.

McCain may have won the nomination in all practical effect, but he has not won the hearts and minds of Republican voters.


The Romanian Aiming For UK Eurovision Glory
29 February 2008

Blogsimonanew This weekend the competition to find the UK's entry for this year's Eurovision Song Contest gets under way. One of the six contestants hoping to represent the UK is a bit different - she's Romanian. Here Simona Armstrong tells Sky News Online why she would be proud to fly the flag for her adopted country.

My name is Simona Armstrong. I'm originally from Romania but I've been living in the UK now for over six years.

I first came to this country to have a second opinion on a skin condition doctors in Romania diagnosed as cancer. However, luckily for me, it wasn't and I was cured within several months by herbal remedies from Napiers in Scotland.

From then on I have been living here trying to pursue my acting and singing career, again I count myself lucky and have had several roles in TV productions.

Then a great break into musical theatre came along when I found myself passing several auditions to appear in Sir Andrew Lloyd Webber's hit TV show How Do You Solve A Problem Like Maria.

The response I got from the British public was overwhelming, I'm extremely grateful for that and although I'm Romanian I very much regard the UK as my home.

This Saturday is the UK's qualifying show for the Eurovision song contest.

Once again I will find myself competing against other contestants, this time for the chance to represent this nation in Eurovision.

I love Eurovision and I think the UK is in with a good chance this year as the songs and artists are all very good.

Some people say "But you're Romanian, you can't represent the UK".

But if I do happen to win I won't be the first foreigner to represent Britain and knowing this great country I'm sure I won't be the last.

The other contestants are Michelle Gayle, Rob McVeigh, Andy Abraham, LoveShy and The Revelations. Eurovision: Your Decision is on BBC1 on Saturday at 7pm.


Democrats Play Out TV 'Bore Draw'
27 February 2008

350democrats By Jeff Coryell (aka. Yellow Dog Sammy), US political blogger

Everyone pretty much expected Hillary Clinton to march into that debate and clobber Obama.

She practically promised as much. But then, she couldn't really do that, could she? So she compromised, dropping down about six notches from righteous indignation to petty annoyance.

And it didn't really work. Although she called Obama's tactics "disturbing" and referred to his campaign mailers several times as "inaccurate" and "misleading,' her fusillade appeared to inflict no real damage and soon subsided.

Surely it was disappointing to her chanting, cheering, sign-waving supporters out in the snowstorm, or would have been if they had heard her say it.

The supporters of the two candidates weren't deterred in the least by the storm that arrived in the hours before the event, the worst such storm we've had this winter so far.

They trudged through the icy slush and took up their station along Prospect Avenue, chanting and hollering and trying to elicit responses from the passing cars. (A big dump truck honked to the Clinton supporters while I was nearby, and a city bus seemed to slow as it turned the corner so that the passengers could rap on the windows and wave to the Obama people.)

View From The Press Room

Rival supporters make themselves heard.

One woman told me that she had come down from Michigan, in part because the delegates from that state would not be counted, a sanction imposed when Michigan party officials moved their primary to an unauthorised early date.

Inside, attendees who had paid thousands of dollars for packages that included a VIP reception were probably dissappointed as well. Both candidates had a detailed grasp of health care policy, spouting statistics and studies as they dissected each other's proposals.

But it was, in a word, tedious. A fellow blogger who spent the first half hour of the debate in the general audience returned to the media room to announce that the whole affair was boring.

Certainly Clinton did not do well with her attempt at humour. The hundreds of reporters in the media room groaned and booed when she complained about always getting the first question and made a reference to a TV comedy skit.

I don't think either side got quite what they wanted. The Clinton camp wanted some vengeance for the unfair treatment they feel she has received from the press and from her adversary.

Obama's people wanted him to soar to the inspirational heights of the speeches he gives at his rallies. Instead the contest turned into a long slog of wrangling and policy disputes.

They were both competent, they displayed their respective strengths well enough, but there was no decisive moment and no clear advantage to either.

In the spin room afterward, Clinton's biggest supporter in Ohio, Governor Ted Strickland, sounded almost plaintive in his defence of her performance.

She made important points to which people should pay more attention, he said, and she shouldn't be blamed by association for something that her husband did while president (that is, the much maligned North American Free Trade Treaty).

Sparse praise for a candidate who clearly needed a knockout blow to turn around her sagging fortunes in this race.


Eyewitness: Save The Children
18 February 2008

Children are bearing the brunt of the shocking violence in Kenya that has followed the disputed January elections, says aid agency Save the Children. Many have been witness to or victims of attacks and abuse, and 100,000 children are now living in makeshift camps, often without clean water, sanitation and schooling. Carolyn Watt has been with the charity's teams working in the camps and is Sky's Eyewitness blogger in Kenya.

KenyaNakuru, Kenya

It’s taken hours to make the journey from Nairobi to the southern Rift Valley town of Nakuru in western Kenya.

Having finally patched up the puncture that left our car paralysed five miles from the now infamous Nakuru Ask showground, we pull into the camp that over the last two months has become home to 14,500 people.

All of them have been chased from their homes by the vicious ethnic violence that has dominated Kenya since the disputed January election. I get out of the car. The stench of rotting cabbage and human waste is stifling.

This morning I left Kenya’s capital city, where the political great and the good continue tortured peace talks in an attempt to bridge the divide between President Mwai Kibaki and the opposition leader Raila Odinga. 

Here, 150 kilometres away, families are still arriving at the camp. I meet men, women and children, who have witnessed heinous crimes.

Driven from their homelands, homes and businesses burnt to the ground, their families and communities plundered. They tell stories of murder, rape, forced evictions, looting and huge internal displacement.

They tell me about machete-wielding men who came to their homes stripped to the waist, some with guns, some carrying burning torches, others with bows and poisoned arrows. All with destruction in mind.

I meet one nine-year-old boy, Simon, who has not spoken a word since his father was beaten to death as he clung desperately to his body. Countless others, aged from four to 13 years old, recount stories of family and friends beaten – sometimes to death – their homes burnt.

Who can tell the long-term impact on these children of what they have witnessed in the nationwide violence that has been driven by ethnicity and perceived political affiliations, but blurred with opportunistic vandalism and banditry.

I am with a team of social workers from Save the Children, which is working in the camp to trace the families of separated children, to train teachers to support traumatised children, and has set up ‘safe play’ areas in the camps to make sure children have a protected place to relax and play.

Many of the children we speak to have been separated from their parents and families, exposed to exploitation and abuse.

There are unconfirmed reports of girls as young as nine years old being lured into prostitution by older men from the showground gates. Some are orphans. Others left parents behind in villages across the Rift Valley as they fled for safety.
Nakuru for now remains calm. While the possibility of revenge attacks remains, the 7pm city-wide curfew has prevented much of the violence that characterised the previous six weeks.
But as the talks go on, what next for the displaced people like those holed up in Nukuru’s showground?

Save the Children says that 10 million children are dying unnecessarily each year from illnesses that are easy to cure. It has published a new report, Saving Children's Lives: Why Equity Matters. Save The Children's Head of News Dominic Nutt is Sky's Eyewitness blogger in Angola

Luanda, Angola

Day Four

Save the Children’s campaign is to cut by two-thirds the number of children who die before their fifth birthday.

Yesterday I was saying how easy it is to save a child’s life – with clean water, a mosquito net and cheap vaccinations.

We know we can do it, with your help. With 10 million children under the age dying each year from preventable diseases, we know we have to act.

But of course, governments in poor countries like Angola have to take their share of the responsibility too – or their share of the blame if they fail their own children.

The reason I’m here is because in Angola, a country that is not officially ‘poor’, one in four children die before they are five.

Change for children is possible.

If you need an example of how it can be done, look at Bangladesh – a country that is poorer than Angola but, by following the right healthcare and child-friendly policies, has reduced its child mortality figures.

What’s going wrong in Angola? Well the Angolan government can and should answer for itself.

What I have seen has left me shocked: flashy towers going up all over the capital in a relentless drive for the petro-dollar while nearby were sprawling slums where people lived in tiny tin shacks from whence a constant trail of women and children ferried water, in buckets, from unsanitary trucks or from holes in the ground.

Those with an electricity supply (very few people have electricity – and even those who are connected find their power is constantly interrupted) boil their water to clean it. Those without, drink it dirty or add bleach.

I saw children collecting water from a broken mains pipe. I even saw people mopping up water spilled from a tanker that had crashed and was on its roof. The driver would have been badly injured, or even killed. But no one could afford to let the water drain away.

And I saw money being spent on pumping more sand on to the beach – presumably to extend it to make it look pretty, though I can’t be sure as no one could or would tell me why this was happening.

Basically, for all the world, it looked to me that money was being thrown at expensive offices, housing and other schemes while the poor went without.

Save the Children has managed to cut the malaria rate among children in one area of the country by around 80 per cent by handing out mosquito nets. As a result children who would otherwise have died, will live beyond their fifth birthday.

Simple steps do work. But we need governments to do their bit too.

They need to open and staff health clinics that the poor can afford to use. And they need to provide clean water for all.

The Angolan economy may be expanding, but the benefits must be used to help the children.

:: Find out more about Save the Children's biggest global campaign by clicking here

Day Three

One in four children in Angola die before their fifth birthday. Most Angolans have bigger families than we do in Britain – five or more kids is not unusual.

So imagine this: if you were an Angolan mum or dad, the chances are that you would have had to bury at least one of your children in the past few years while he or she was still a toddler.

But if you’re like me, these statistics will leave you cold. Angola is a long way away and frankly, there’s nothing we can do about it – is there?

Let me answer that by introducing you to a woman I met today – Maria Antonio Pedro. She lives in a slum called Hoji-Ya-Henda on the edge of the Angolan capital, Luanda.

Today, Maria has four children aged between two and 12. She used to have five but in 2001 her youngest boy died, aged only three. She and her second husband (her first died) scrape a living as best they can – though, as is typical in Luanda, they have no regular work.

"I need about 1,800 Kwanzas (about £12.50) a day for food and water for me and my children," Maria says.  "I don't know how much we earn because sometimes it's nothing and other times it’s something. Yesterday I was selling chicken in the market and I earned 400 Kwanzas (about £2.70)."

She spends about £1.35 a day on buying water – dirty water – that is delivered by lorry. To try to clean it she puts household bleach in it.

Apart from the fact it tastes disgusting, bleach does not kill all the germs and like millions of youngsters in Angola, her children constantly suffer from stomach upsets and diarrhoea – one of the big child killers in poor countries.

It sounds simple and it sounds stupid – why should a kid die from a stomach upset? The problem when you’re poor and don’t have clean water is that as a child, you quickly and fatally dehydrate.

Without treatment – something as simple as oral re-hydration salts which cost just a few pence – you lose vital salts and minerals. But clinics in Angola are dreadful places with few medicines – and to get treatment costs.

When Maria’s son died, they still charged her for his treatment.

"I don’t know why you’re asking me about this," Maria says of the death of her boy. "It’s not unusual. Yes, I think about him every day. Why are you interested? No one has asked these questions before."

I feel crushed and reel out the usual platitudes about wanting to tell her story and wanting to help. But I’m mumbling now and want to leave.

Save the Children has launched a campaign to address the absurdity and horror of these statistics – the ones that this morning, before I met Maria, went over my head.

Ten million children die, like Maria’s, every year before reaching their fifth birthday. Maria’s boy is just one.

Save the Children has launched its campaign to save a child’s life. It is shockingly simple. I urge you to help. With you we can save lives. To find out how, check out our website.

:: Find out more about Save the Children's biggest global campaign by clicking here

Day Two

Here in my room in my guest house in a district of Luanda called Combatente I am melting. The air conditioning machine has blown up.

When it was on it was like sharing a small cupboard with a bronchial byplane revving for takeoff – although I suspect a plane would have produced more of a breeze than the air conditioning unit ever managed in its short life.

I am wearing only a kikoi (a Kenyan version of a sarong) hunched over a laptop which is adding to the stifling heat. But I can’t keep cool and am pouring litre after litre of tepid mineral water down my throat to keep hydrated. Water is precious round here and I am guarding mine jealously.

Earlier, my colleagues and I ended our day above the city on a hill where the Portuguese colonists built a big, white fort to keep out rival Dutch imperialists.

As the sun set over the oil derricks off the Luandan coast, a massive and prolonged roar rose out of the slums below. The whole city cheered as one.

The national football team had just scored a screamer of a goal against their quarter final opponents, Egypt, in the African Nations Cup.

We had spent the day in those slums and down there, in the heat and the filth of Luandan  poverty there seemed little to cheer about.

In Hoji-ya-Henda filth piled up in the streets. And you can’t escape the stench of human spoil. The dirt roads are pitted and full of foul water and the inhabitants broiled in sour sweat.

No water is pumped here and few houses are on the electricity grid. Those that have power allow their friends and neighbours to tap their supply with wires which are strung across streets and alleys. It’s dangerous, when it works, but even the legitimate supply fails often.

And water is even harder to come by. It is trucked in by entrepreneurs who sell it by the bucket to families with little or no incomes. It isn’t clean – so mothers have to put bleach – yes, household bleach – in it to kill the germs, before their children drink it.

Angola has the second highest child mortality rate in the world with one in four children dying before they reach their fifth birthdays. One of the biggest killers is diarrhoea. When a child gets a stomach upset – which is very often here - they quickly dehydrate and if they are not treated, they stand a good chance of dying.

I spoke to two mothers who had lost three babies between them. They both said that their surviving children constantly suffer from diarrhoea.

It is obvious that clean water would save many babies in Hoji-ya-Henda. And so would a decent, free health service.

Both mothers told me they had taken their babies to local clinics which could do nothing to save their children – but the clinics still charged their parents for their services. In one case, because the child died, the clinic offered a 50 per cent discount  – some sort of blessing, perhaps.

Day One

It is eight years since I was last in Angola: since then it’s changed and so have I.

Back in 1999 I hated it and it hated me.

Then the west African country was still at war with itself. It was a vicious, nasty and spiteful war, as bitter as it was pointless. The dominant and ruling force, the ostensibly socialist MPLA, ran the north, including the capital, Luanda. UNITA controlled the rural south.

It all ended, suddenly, when the UNITA leader was assassinated. Bang and it was over.

The war had turned brother on brother.  Thousands were killed and many more were wounded.

Vast swathes of land were sown with millions of landmines; boys and girls who should have been at school learning to read and write were learning to kill.

And yet suddenly, for no reason it was over. A good thing, of course – but if it were that easy to stop the fighting, why on earth didn’t it end years ago? No one can convince me that one life wasted in those 30-odd years was worth it.

When I first visited Luanda, the conflict still had a few years to run, but the harvest of war was already being gathered. The capital was full of refugees who had fled the fighting from across the country.

They lived in squalor with no work, no housing, poor water and bad food. Children in rags sold chewing gum, key rings, shoelaces and general tat to drivers in traffic jams.

Young girls, raped and impregnated by enemy combatants, raised the unwelcome fruit of the killers’ loins in sweaty UN tent cities.

Many people hobbled about on limbs destroyed by antipersonnel mines – ordnance designed not to kill but ‘only’ to injure, so the victim would remain a live but useless burden on his combatant comrades. Planted in fields, and around water sources and fruit trees, it was more often than not that civilians, especially children, who bore the brunt of their cruelty.

Children as young as five hunted like feral pack animals in the streets, swarming round the rich, white foreigner. They were charmless, because they were hungry and had no adults to feed them.

Their frowns and scowls belied a pain that no five year old should have had to endure. They would run at me as soon as I immerged from my guest house.

It was about survival – their survival. It was life or death and they would not, could not, go away.

But on my first day back, it seems all is different, at least so far.

I have travelled across Africa many times since that long-ago trip to Angola and I am less easily affected. My heart has not exactly hardened, but I am better prepared, emotionally and mentally. Back then I was more vulnerable and afraid.

The war has ended and there seem to be fewer children out on the streets and everyone seems slightly better dressed – not well dressed, necessarily, but perhaps a little less ragged. On first sight, maybe everyone is just a bit better off. I’m not sure.

And today, there is a mobile phone network. I can call my wife whenever I want. I’m not lonely and if things get on top of me I can call Glenda and seek her counsel. Back then, there was literally no means of communicating with colleagues, friends or family and I felt trapped.

I am writing this blog sitting on a clean, cockroach-free bed using a wireless internet connection having eaten an ok meal in a safe part of town. Amazing.

And outside, I can see huge, opulent, housing blocks going up. I can count 15 cranes in different locations from my small window alone.

Something is happening here in Luanda. Maybe it is a good thing – I don’t know and I can’t yet say. Because if I have learned anything in the eight years since I first came to Angola and Africa, it is not to judge by first impressions.

:: Find out more about Save the Children's biggest global campaign by clicking here


Serbs Face Painful Loss Of Their Cradle Kosovo
17 February 2008

350_serbia By Jaksa Scekic, Serbian journalist

If 20 years ago somebody had written that in 2008 Slovenia would hold EU presidency and Kosovo would become independent, nobody would have paid any attention.

But now it is reality.

From Sunday, Europe has gained a new state - the Kosovo republic.

All the Balkan troubles started in Kosovo in the late eighties - bloody wars followed - and now everything has finished in Kosovo.

The final stage of disintegration of the country known as Yugoslavia has come to an end.
Serbia has become the biggest loser of all ex Yugoslavian countries in the Balkan tragedy.

From today Serbia is 15% smaller and Kosovo, which is for most Serbs cradle of their civilisation, is another country.

According to the Serbian prime minister and president, who has travelled to New York to attend the UN Security council session, Serbs will never accept the fact that Kosovo is not part of Serbia.

Serbia will now help the Serbian community in Kosovo much more and will take every possible legal action - even maybe taking some countries which recognise Kosovo's Independence to the International Court in The Hague.

But the irony is that the Serbian democratic government now has to pay the price for what the Slobodan Milosevic regime did to Kosovo Albanians in late nineties.

Maybe this is the reason why most of the Serbs feel betrayed by the West, and especially by the United States.

For a lot of Serbs who were against Milosevic, Kosovo was a different issue.

Too complex, and maybe for a westerner, too irrational.

But Serbian history belongs to Kosovo. Serbian roots are from Kosovo, and now Kosovo has gone for ever.

Serbia will take no military action. For most Serbs, their country has been humiliated. Some hooligans showed their anger through violent demonstrations at the US embassy in Kosovo.

The Serbian nation now has a choice: either will stay and live in history based on Kosovo myth, or start looking into the future, towards the Europe.

But it will not be easy, because that same Europe took Kosovo from them.

But, at the same time, Serbs know that Kosovo had been lost a long time ago.

Maybe that is the reason why there will be no clashes or hot military rhetoric. Life in Serbia will go on, but the feeling of injustice will remain.


Undercover Encounter With The Tiger Traders
13 February 2008

350sumatratigerincage

Julia Ng, author of the TRAFFIC report on Sumatran Tigers, describes a typical encounter with a tiger bone seller.

I am walking along a crowded, narrow street in Medan, the capital of Sumatra, Indonesia.

All around the air is thick with dust, stirred up by passing traffic.

As the buses and scooters zoom past, I scan the contents laid out on an old velvet cloth on a roadside wooden table before me.

All manner of brightly-coloured gems are present - and there amongst them is what looks like a an off-white lump of stone.

I pick it up and to examine it more closely. There are grooves down the side and it is the right size and weight. To my trained eye, there is no doubt whatsoever as to its true identity: a Tiger canine tooth!

I feign delight at my discovery, hoping to interest the vendor.

"Pak, berapa ini?" [How much?] I ask.

The vendor tells me the price and I steer the conversation round to try and find out more.

"So where did it come from and can you get me more?" I innocently enquire.

Once satisfied with the information I receive, I make my excuses and carry on down the street. Soon I come across another gemstone vendor, and the process begins again.

At the end of the day I review my findings: five canines in all. That means at least two tigers have been killed.

Tigers once roamed the islands of Bali and Java, but now they are gone.

If the demand for tiger parts continues, it will only be a matter of time before the tigers of Sumatra follow those of Java and Bali into oblivion, and Indonesia will have lost one of its richest natural treasures.

The world simply cannot sit back and let this happen; I know my work must go on.

:: Read Sky News environment correspondent Catherine Jacob's report on the tiger trade here

:: Find out more about the work of TRAFFIC here